Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-09-15 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 522 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 has an overall score of 83, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 overall score. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note8 is a lot older than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's body is incredibly lighter and extremely thinner. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note8 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1440 x 2560px resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixel number per inch of screen. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Note8, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy Note8 captures a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same resolution camera and a same size sensor, the Galaxy Note8 also counts with a much better video resolution. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features superior battery duration than Galaxy Note8, because it has a 36% bigger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.