Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-10-24 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 is better than the Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, getting an 83.3 score against 73.5. IPhone 11's construction is noticeably newer than the Samsung Galaxy On Nxt's, although it is heavier and just a little bit thicker. IPhone 11 works with iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy On Nxt comes with Android OS.
The Apple iPhone 11 has a more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor and 1 GB more RAM memory. Apple iPhone 11 counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a just a little worse pixel number in each screen inch and a bit lower resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy On Nxt features a better memory capacity for apps and games than iPhone 11, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Samsung Galaxy On Nxt has just a little better battery performance than iPhone 11, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 3110mAh.
The iPhone 11 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a lesser MP resolution camera, it also counts with a much higher video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.