Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android | -- |
| 2016-10-24 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than Galaxy On Nxt's global score of 73.5. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus design is newer and just a little bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Galaxy On Nxt. IPhone 8 Plus has a faster processing unit than Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has less cpu cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 8 Plus also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy On Nxt. Both of them have a same size screen, the same number of pixels per inch in the screen and an equal resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels. The iPhone 8 Plus captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger aperture and a lot higher video resolution.
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy On Nxt features improved battery performance than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.