Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android | -- |
| 2016-10-24 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is better than Galaxy On Nxt, with an 88.1 score against 73.5. IPhone X's design is newer and just a bit thinner, but also a bit heavier than Galaxy On Nxt. The iPhone X has a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has 2 lesser cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the iPhone X also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Apple iPhone X features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a bit bigger display, a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little more pixels per screen inch. The Apple iPhone X takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better photos in low-light situations and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The iPhone X features a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy On Nxt features superior battery life than iPhone X, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.