Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android | -- |
| 2016-10-24 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is much better than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, having a score of 82 against 73.5. Although the Apple iPhone XR is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, it is a bit thicker and heavier. Apple iPhone XR has a superior hardware performance than Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has lesser cpu cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Apple iPhone XR counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a little worse resolution of 828 x 1792px and a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite bigger display. The iPhone XR features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a way better video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy On Nxt features a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy On Nxt features a bit longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 12% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.