Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android | -- |
| 2016-10-24 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS has a general score of 84.2, which is better than the Galaxy On Nxt's 73.5 overall score. Although Apple iPhone XS is just a bit heavier than the Galaxy On Nxt, it's a bit thinner and also newer. IPhone XS has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a little bigger screen, a little greater display density and a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436.
The Apple iPhone XS counts with a superior processor than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64 bits CPU. Apple iPhone XS takes better videos and photos than Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a back-facing camera with less mega pixels, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photography and video.
Samsung Galaxy On Nxt has more memory to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy On Nxt counts with longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 24% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.