Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | -- |
| 2016-10-24 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gray and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a global score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy On Nxt's score of 73.5. The Google Pixel construction is somewhat lighter but just a little bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, and both of them were released with only a few months difference. The Google Pixel has a little better performance than Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has 4 less processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel features a little more vivid display than Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 1920px, the Google Pixel also counts with a just a little greater pixel density. Google Pixel shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a camera with a worse 12.3 MP resolution and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a way better video resolution.
Google Pixel features a better storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy On Nxt features superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.