Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | -- |
| 2016-10-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, with a overall score of 80 against 73.5. Google Pixel 3's design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, but it is lighter. The Google Pixel 3 has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy On Nxt, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Google Pixel 3 also has a little bit greater display density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2160.
The Google Pixel 3 has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 3 features a bit better camera than Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture and a way higher (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy On Nxt features more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 256 GB. Galaxy On Nxt features a bit superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 13% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.