Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android | Android 5.0 |
| 2016-10-24 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Metal | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | S-LCD 3 |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has a global score of 77.7, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy On Nxt's 73.5 score. Even though the HTC One M9 is older and thicker than the Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, it's design is still just a little bit lighter. The HTC One M9 counts with Android 5.0 operating system, and Samsung Galaxy On Nxt counts with Android operating system.
HTC One M9 features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1920 x 1080, the HTC One M9 also counts with a little bit better screen density. HTC One M9 counts with a quite better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 3 GB of RAM memory, the HTC One M9 also has a 64-bit processing unit and a graphics processing unit.
The Galaxy On Nxt counts with a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy On Nxt also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy On Nxt counts with improved battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 16% greater battery capacity.
HTC One M9 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photos, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.