Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-10-24 | 2018-06-01 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is better than Galaxy On Nxt, with a score of 81 against 73.5. The LG G7 ThinQ body has the same thickness than Galaxy On Nxt, but it's a little bit lighter. LG G7 ThinQ counts with Android 9.0 Pie OS, while Galaxy On Nxt works with Android OS. LG G7 ThinQ features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG G7 ThinQ features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a bit larger screen, a much better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher display pixel density. The LG G7 ThinQ takes better videos and photos than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a better resolution camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and a lot higher video quality.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because it has 64 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy On Nxt counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.