Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | -- |
| 2016-10-24 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is better than Galaxy On Nxt, getting a general score of 87.1 against 73.5. The LG Velvet construction has the same thickness than Galaxy On Nxt, but it's just a bit heavier. The LG Velvet has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy On Nxt, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG Velvet also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG Velvet features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2460px resolution. LG Velvet features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet counts with better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a 4300mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh. LG Velvet shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a camera with a much better resolution, a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and videos and a much higher (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.