Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-24 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Galaxy On Nxt, with a global score of 98.9 against 73.5. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra comes with Android 13 OS, and Galaxy On Nxt comes with Android OS. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is incredibly newer, but heavier and a little bit thicker than Galaxy On Nxt.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better display than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a larger screen, a little bit higher screen density and a way higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better processor than Galaxy On Nxt, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior camera than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and video and a camera with a much higher 108 MP resolution. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.