Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2016-10-24 | 2015-08-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Metal | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 is just a bit better than the Galaxy On Nxt, getting an 80.2 score against 73.5. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note5 is older and a bit heavier than Galaxy On Nxt, it's body is still a bit thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy On Nxt, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note5 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note5 counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a little larger display, a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel density. The Galaxy Note5 captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy On Nxt, and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Galaxy Note5 also has a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a back-facing camera with a better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy On Nxt features a better memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note5, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 256 GB. The Galaxy On Nxt features a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.