Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2016-10-24 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is much better than Galaxy On Nxt, having a global score of 86.3 against 73.5. The Galaxy S10e body has the same thickness than the Galaxy On Nxt, but it is lighter. Galaxy S10e features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a little higher display pixel density, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a bit larger screen.
Galaxy S10e counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a quite better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e takes better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a camera with lesser mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much bigger aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a lot higher (4K) video definition. Samsung Galaxy On Nxt counts with a little better battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.