Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is a lot better than Galaxy On Nxt, with a 94.8 score against 73.5. The Samsung Galaxy S20 construction has the same thickness than Galaxy On Nxt, but it is a bit lighter. The Samsung Galaxy S20 comes with Android 13 OS, while Galaxy On Nxt has Android OS. The Galaxy S20 features a sharper screen than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a greater pixel quantity in each screen inch, a quite bigger screen and a way better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S20 has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a quite better processing power than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has more RAM.
Galaxy S20 has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a back facing camera with less MP, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited situations and a lot higher video quality. The Galaxy S20 features better battery duration than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.