Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is much better than Galaxy On Nxt's general score of 73.5. Although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is extremely newer than Galaxy On Nxt, it's notably heavier and somewhat thicker. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with Android 13 operating system, while Galaxy On Nxt works with Android operating system.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 9 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a bigger screen and a higher pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and video, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with a way higher 108 MP resolution. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better battery performance than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.