Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-10-24 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is way better than the Galaxy On Nxt's score of 73.5. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a way newer phone than the Galaxy On Nxt, although it is somewhat thicker and extremely heavier. Galaxy S22 Ultra has Android 13 operating system, while Galaxy On Nxt comes with Android operating system.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a just a bit better amount of pixels per inch of screen, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a bigger screen. Galaxy S22 Ultra features just a little better processing power than Galaxy On Nxt, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S22 Ultra captures greater photos and videos than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a camera with way more mega-pixels, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a larger camera aperture to take better photos and videos in low light situations. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.