Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2016-10-24 | 2017-04-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 is better than Galaxy On Nxt, with a general score of 81.7 against 73.5. The Galaxy S8 is a a bit lighter cellphone than the Galaxy On Nxt, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. The Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a much better display than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a much better 1440 x 2960 resolution, a greater pixel density and a quite bigger display.
The Galaxy S8 counts with a way bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 256 GB, the Galaxy S8 also has 32 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy S8 features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy On Nxt, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S8 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy On Nxt has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S8, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Galaxy S8 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a lower 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot better video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.