Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2016-10-24 | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is better than Galaxy On Nxt, with a general score of 83.3 against 73.5. Samsung Galaxy S9's construction is newer and a little bit lighter, but also a bit thicker than the Galaxy On Nxt. Galaxy S9 features a better looking screen than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a quite bigger screen, a much higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy S9 counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that holds up to 400 GB. Galaxy S9 has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy On Nxt, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S9 also has more RAM.
The Galaxy S9 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a lesser megapixels back camera, it also counts with a way larger aperture and a much better 3840x2160 video quality. Galaxy On Nxt counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S9, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.