Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-24 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is way better than Galaxy On Nxt's 73.5 score. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner than Galaxy On Nxt's, but it's extremely heavier. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with Android 11 operating system, while Galaxy On Nxt has Android operating system.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a much larger display. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a superior processing unit than Galaxy On Nxt, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better camera than Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a lesser mega pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.