Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-24 | 2020-05-12 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than the Galaxy On Nxt, getting a score of 87.9 against 73.5. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro body is extremely newer, but notably heavier and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy On Nxt. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with Android 10 OS, and Galaxy On Nxt has Android OS.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy On Nxt, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a greater storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a camera in the back with way more MP and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a 42% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.