Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-24 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is much better than the Galaxy On Nxt, with an 81.1 score against 73.5. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is way newer than Galaxy On Nxt, it's thicker and a lot heavier. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro comes with Android 10 operating system, and Galaxy On Nxt comes with Android operating system.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little faster processor than Galaxy On Nxt, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a little lower number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy On Nxt, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a much more mega pixels camera in the back and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.