Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2018-01-09 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime's 76.9 score. The Apple iPhone X construction is just a bit heavier but just a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, and both of them were only released 2 months apart. IPhone X has a better performing CPU than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has lesser cores (but faster) and 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone X has a much better looking display than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a quite greater quantity of pixels per inch of display, a bit larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels. IPhone X counts with a better camera than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition, a bigger sensor taking higher quality photographs and a larger diafragm aperture.
Apple iPhone X counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime features improved battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.