Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2018-01-09 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS has an overall score of 84.2, which is a bit better than the Galaxy On7 Prime's overall score of 76.9. The iPhone XS body is just a little bit heavier but a little thinner than Galaxy On7 Prime, and they were only released 8 months apart. Apple iPhone XS features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a bit bigger screen, a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a just a little more pixels per inch of display.
The iPhone XS has a better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone XS takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a lesser mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a bigger back camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures and videos and a larger aperture to capture better low light photography.
The Galaxy On7 Prime has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy On7 Prime also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 256 GB. Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime features better battery life than iPhone XS, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.