Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2018-01-09 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gray and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, getting a overall score of 80.2 against 76.9. Even though the Google Pixel is older and just a little thicker than the Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, it's body is still lighter. Google Pixel features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, although it has less processing cores , they both have the same RAM amount.
The Google Pixel features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 1920 resolution, the Google Pixel also counts with a just a bit better count of pixels per inch of screen. Google Pixel shoots clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a lower 12.3 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a tinier camera aperture which is not good for taking pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy On7 Prime features just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 256 GB. Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime features improved battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.