Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2018-01-09 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than the Galaxy On7 Prime, having a general score of 80 against 76.9. Google Pixel 3 is a somewhat lighter phone than Galaxy On7 Prime, but they are 0.31inches thick. Google Pixel 3 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Google Pixel 3 also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a quite better display pixels density.
The Galaxy On7 Prime has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy On7 Prime also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 256 GB. Google Pixel 3 counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount.
Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime has a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 13% more battery capacity. Google Pixel 3 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a back camera with a worse 12.2 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a larger sensor providing a better image quality and a larger aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.