Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-01-09 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than the Galaxy On7 Prime, getting a global score of 82.9 against 76.9. Google Pixel 4a's construction is newer and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy On7 Prime's, although it's also a bit thicker. These phones use Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a has the previous 11 version while Galaxy On7 Prime has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Google Pixel 4a has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a quite bigger screen, a little bit greater pixel density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Google Pixel 4a features just a bit better performance than Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 4a has a slightly better camera than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low light environments, a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger back camera sensor.
Galaxy On7 Prime features just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime counts with just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.