Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11 |
| 2018-01-09 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the Galaxy On7 Prime, getting a global score of 87.5 against 76.9. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has older 11 version and Galaxy On7 Prime has Android 9.0 Pie. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a extremely newer and just a bit lighter phone than the Galaxy On7 Prime, but it is just a bit thicker.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a little bit larger screen, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit higher pixels quantity in each display inch. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better processor than Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse 12.2 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures, a larger aperture to capture better photography in low light situations and a lot better (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime features just a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 256 GB. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has an 18 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.