Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2018-01-09 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than the Galaxy On7 Prime's 76.9 score. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while Galaxy On7 Prime has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is notably newer, but just a little thicker and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy On7 Prime.
The Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime features a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot better camera than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low light environments, a way better (4K) video quality, a lot better resolution back camera and a way larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.