Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-01-09 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is better than Galaxy On7 Prime, getting a general score of 87 against 76.9. These phones have Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has the older 11 version while Galaxy On7 Prime has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy On7 Prime, but it is somewhat heavier.
Motorola razr (2020) features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola razr (2020) has a screen that is very similar to the screen in Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although the Motorola razr (2020) has a bit worse resolution of 876 x 2142 and a bit inferior pixels quantity per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit larger display.
Motorola razr (2020) shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a lot better (4K) video resolution, a bigger camera aperture for better photos in low light situations, a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Galaxy On7 Prime features superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.