Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.3 | 31.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | 2008-04-02 |
| -- | 4.25 x 1.80 x 0.60 inches |
| -- | 2.60 ounces |
| $ 290.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | -- |
| -- | 128 x 160 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 109 pixels per inch | 102 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32,77 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| -- | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 700mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 424 hours standby time 7.6 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.08 |
Comparison review
The Nokia 1680 classic has a score of 31.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy Q's 28.3 overall score. Nokia 1680 classic features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Q, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen. Nokia 1680 classic and Galaxy Q have really similar processors, both of them have a 0-Core processor.
Nokia 1680 classic counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Q. The Nokia 1680 classic shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy Q. Nokia 1680 classic features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Q.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Nokia 1680 classic is also a bargain compared to the other devices, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.