Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.3 | 31 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | 2007-05-03 |
| -- | 4.13 x 1.77 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 2.32 ounces |
| $ 290.00 | $ 85.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | -- |
| -- | 128 x 160 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 109 pixels per inch | 73 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 4.8 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 2,05 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| -- | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 700mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 320 hours standby time 6 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.08 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 2630 is a bit better than Galaxy Q, having a 31 score against 28.3. Nokia 2630's CPU is very similar to the processor in Samsung Galaxy Q, both have 0 processing cores. The Galaxy Q features a little sharper screen than Nokia 2630, because it has more pixels per inch in the display. Nokia 2630 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Q.
The Nokia 2630 counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Q. Nokia 2630 has a superior battery performance than Galaxy Q.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Nokia 2630 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.