Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.3 | 31.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | 2006-09-13 |
| -- | 4.14 x 1.74 x 0.73 inches |
| -- | 2.96 ounces |
| $ 290.00 | $ 139.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | -- |
| -- | 128 x 160 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| 109 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 4,1 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| -- | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 970mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0 |
Comparison review
The Nokia 6085 has a score of 31.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Q's 28.3 overall score. Nokia 6085 counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy Q, because it has a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Nokia 6085 has a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Q.
Nokia 6085's processing unit is just as good as the processing unit in Galaxy Q, both of them have 0 CPU cores. Nokia 6085 takes a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy Q. Nokia 6085 counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy Q.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Nokia 6085 is also by far the cheapest one, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.