Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.3 | 31 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 8.0 |
| -- | 2005-02-14 |
| -- | 4.28 x 2.17 x 0.81 inches |
| -- | 4.69 ounces |
| $ 290.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | -- |
| -- | 176 x 208 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 109 pixels per inch | 94 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 10,24 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | RS-MMC external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 1.30 MP |
| 0 | 4.51 |
| -- | UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 6 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.2 |
Comparison review
The Nokia 6680 has a general score of 31, which is a bit better than Galaxy Q's 28.3 overall score. The Nokia 6680 has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Q, although it has a just a bit worse amount of pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy Q and the Nokia 6680 both count with really similar processing units, both of them have a 0-Core CPU.
Nokia 6680 takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Q. Nokia 6680 features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Q. The Nokia 6680 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Q.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Nokia 6680 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.