Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.1.2, 2.3.6 | -- |
| 2012-01-30 | 2018-06-08 |
| 4.85 x 2.48 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 768 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.59 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 570 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is way better than Galaxy S Advance, having a global score of 81.3 against 60.4. The LG V35 ThinQ design is noticeably newer and extremely thinner than the Galaxy S Advance's, but it's also heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ features a brighter screen than Galaxy S Advance, because it has way more pixels per inch of display, a way better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a way bigger screen.
LG V35 ThinQ features much more memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S Advance, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 56 GB more internal memory. LG V35 ThinQ counts with an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy S Advance, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S Advance, because it has a 120% more battery capacity. LG V35 ThinQ features a much better camera than Galaxy S Advance, because it has a much better 3840x2160 video definition, a lot higher 16 mega pixels resolution camera and a much larger aperture.
LG V35 ThinQ is a little more expensive than the Galaxy S Advance, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.