Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.7 | 69.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 2.3.6, 2.3.4 | Android 10 |
| 2011-08-30 | 2020-06-12 |
| 4.96 x 2.60 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.30 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Champagne pink and Midnight blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 217 pixels per inch | 271 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset |
| Exnyos C210 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 7.83 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3550mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 400 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto E (2020) is a bit better than the Galaxy S II AT&T, getting a 69.7 score against 63.7. Even though Moto E (2020) is incredibly heavier than Galaxy S II AT&T, it's just a little bit thinner and extremely newer. Both devices we are comparing use Android OS, but the Moto E (2020) has an older 10 version while Galaxy S II AT&T has Android 2.3.6 version.
The Galaxy S II AT&T has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto E (2020), although it has a way lower 800 x 480px resolution, a really smaller screen and a bit less pixels per display inch. The Moto E (2020) has a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB and 32 GB internal storage capacity.
The Moto E (2020) features a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T, because it has more processing cores and 1 GB more RAM. The Motorola Moto E (2020) has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto E (2020) also has a bigger camera sensor, a much bigger aperture, a back camera with a lot higher resolution and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Moto E (2020) has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T, because it has a 115 percent greater battery size.
Moto E (2020) is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.