Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T
SGH-i777| Global Score | |
| 63.7 | 69.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 2.3.6, 2.3.4 | Android 10 |
| 2011-08-30 | 2020-08-12 |
| 4.96 x 2.60 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.03 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.30 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| -- | Midnight Gray, Sunrise Orange and Twilight Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 180.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 217 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos chipset | MediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G chipset |
| Exnyos C210 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 8.8 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 400 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi 9C has a general score of 69.5, which is a bit better than Galaxy S II AT&T's 63.7 general score. Xiaomi Redmi 9C's construction has the same thickness than Galaxy S II AT&T, but it is incredibly heavier. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi 9C has an older 10 version while Galaxy S II AT&T has Android 2.3.6.
Xiaomi Redmi 9C has a quite better hardware performance than Galaxy S II AT&T, because it has 6 more cores and a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy S II AT&T has just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi 9C, although it has a lot lower 800 x 480 resolution, a little lower pixels count per inch in the display and a way smaller screen.
Xiaomi Redmi 9C features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi 9C also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited situations and a much better resolution camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi 9C features slightly more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 32 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi 9C has a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Xiaomi Redmi 9C is also cheaper than the Galaxy S II AT&T.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.