Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S II
GT-I9100| Global Score | |
| 66 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.0.4, 4.0, 2.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2011-02-13 | 2020-08-20 |
| 4.93 x 2.60 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.09 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4210 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 710 hours standby time 18.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a lot better than Galaxy S II, with a general score of 82.9 against 66. Google Pixel 4a's design is newer and just a bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Galaxy S II. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a has 11 version while Galaxy S II has Android 4.1.2.
The Google Pixel 4a features a faster CPU than Galaxy S II, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy S II, because it has a lot better display pixel density, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a way larger screen.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S II, because it has a lot better (4K) video definition, a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a much bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Google Pixel 4a features a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S II, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Google Pixel 4a has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S II, because it has a 3140mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Google Pixel 4a is also a bit cheaper, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.