Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S II
GT-I9100| Global Score | |
| 66 | 72.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.0.4, 4.0, 2.3 | Android 7.1 Nougat |
| 2011-02-13 | 2017-03-03 |
| 4.93 x 2.60 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.28 inches |
| 4.09 ounces | 4.76 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold and Pink |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 350.00 | $ 218.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 217 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4210 chipset | Xiaomi Surge S1 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-T860 MP4 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G) |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.5 | 5.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2860mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 710 hours standby time 18.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 5c is just a bit better than Galaxy S II, getting a 72.4 score against 66. The Xiaomi Mi 5c construction is incredibly newer and thinner than the Galaxy S II's, but it is heavier. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi 5c has a more recent 7.1 Nougat version and Galaxy S II has Android 4.1.2 version, providing the user a couple additional features.
Xiaomi Mi 5c has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy S II, because it has a much higher display pixels density, a bigger screen and a lot higher 1080 x 1920 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi 5c counts with a faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S II, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with 6 more CPU cores and 2 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi 5c shoots better pictures and videos than Galaxy S II, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and video, a lot higher (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a way better 12 MP resolution. Xiaomi Mi 5c counts with a little bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S II, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 5c features a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S II, because it has a 73 percent greater battery capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 5c not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.