Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 2.3 | -- |
| 2011-08-28 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.11 x 2.71 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.60 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 305.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 207 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1500 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1850mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, getting a general score of 78.5 against 66. Although Motorola One Action is extremely heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, it's just a bit thinner and way newer. Motorola One Action counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a way bigger screen, a lot more pixels per inch in the screen and a much better 1080 x 2520px resolution.
The Motorola One Action counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has 112 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Motorola One Action counts with a more powerful processor than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has 6 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Motorola One Action features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a lot better (4K) video definition and a way more mega pixels back facing camera. The Motorola One Action counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola One Action not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.