Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
64 GBSM-N9005
| Global Score | |
| 66 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 2.3 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2011-08-28 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.11 x 2.71 x 0.37 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.60 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 305.00 | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 207 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1500 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.9 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1850mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 250 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 3.76 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 81.1, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE's 66 general score. Although Galaxy Note 3 is heavier than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, it's thinner and a lot newer. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 3 has a more recent 5.0 version while Samsung Galaxy S II LTE has Android 2.3.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a bigger screen, much more pixels per inch of screen and a much better resolution of 1920 x 1080px. The Galaxy Note 3 features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has 64 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 64 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a superior performance than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a graphics processor, a higher number of cores (and faster) and a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note 3 has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a 3200mAh battery size instead of 1850mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a way higher 13 megapixels resolution back camera, a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a much better (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy Note 3 costs a bit more money than the Galaxy S II LTE, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.