Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66 | 72.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 2.3 | Android 7.1 Nougat |
| 2011-08-28 | 2017-03-03 |
| 5.11 x 2.71 x 0.37 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.28 inches |
| 4.60 ounces | 4.76 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold and Pink |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 305.00 | $ 218.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 207 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Xiaomi Surge S1 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1500 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T860 MP4 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.48 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G) |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.9 | 5.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1850mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2860mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 5c is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, getting a 72.4 score against 66. Xiaomi Mi 5c is a notably newer and way thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, but it is a little heavier. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 5c has newer 7.1 Nougat version and Samsung Galaxy S II LTE has Android 2.3 version.
The Xiaomi Mi 5c features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, because it has way more pixels per inch in the display, a larger screen and a much better 1080 x 1920px resolution. The Xiaomi Mi 5c counts with a quite better hardware performance than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has more processing cores and more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi 5c features a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S II LTE, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi 5c shoots greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Mi 5c has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a 2860mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 5c not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.