Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 2.3 | Android 10 |
| 2011-08-28 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.11 x 2.71 x 0.37 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.60 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 305.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 207 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1500 MHz processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1850mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy S II LTE's general score of 66. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is way newer and a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE's, although it's heavier. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the newer 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S II LTE has Android 2.3, providing a couple nice extra features and increased performance.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a lot bigger screen, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a way greater display density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a quite superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, because it has 5 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a way bigger camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality, a way higher (4K) video resolution and a much higher resolution back facing camera. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a really longer battery life than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.