Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.0.3, 2.3.6, 2.3.5 | -- |
| 2011-08-30 | 2018-05-22 |
| 5.11 x 2.71 x 0.37 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.77 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 207 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 APQ8060 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Scorpion (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1850mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 167 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A6 has a general score of 75.8, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy S II T-Mobile's general score of 65.3. The Samsung Galaxy A6 design is notably newer and thinner than Samsung Galaxy S II T-Mobile's, but it is also somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A6 counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S II T-Mobile, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and also faster).
Galaxy S II T-Mobile counts with a bit better display than Galaxy A6, although it has a lot worse 800 x 480 resolution, a little bit smaller display and a lot lower number of pixels in each inch of display. Galaxy A6 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S II T-Mobile, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A6 also has a bigger sensor capturing better quality pictures, a much higher 16 MP resolution back facing camera and a way bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures.
Samsung Galaxy A6 features a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S II T-Mobile, because it has 32 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 400 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A6 counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S II T-Mobile, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 1850mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy A6 is also cheaper than the Galaxy S II T-Mobile, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.