Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.3 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.0.3, 2.3.6, 2.3.5 | Android 4.0 |
| 2011-08-30 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.11 x 2.71 x 0.37 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.77 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 207 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 APQ8060 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Scorpion (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.5 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1850mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 167 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 3.76 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has an overall score of 71.5, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S II T-Mobile's global score of 65.3. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket's body is just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy S II T-Mobile. These phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has an older 4.0 version while Samsung Galaxy S II T-Mobile has Android 4.1.2.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy S II T-Mobile, because it has a way higher 1280 x 720 pixels resolution, a greater pixels amount in each display inch and a little bit bigger screen. Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy S II T-Mobile, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S III Cricket also has a faster graphics processor running at 400 MHz and a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S III Cricket has a little bit better camera than Galaxy S II T-Mobile, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same aperture and the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy S III Cricket also has a larger sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S II T-Mobile, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 64 GB and 32 GB internal storage. Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S II T-Mobile, because it has a 2100mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Galaxy S II T-Mobile, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.