Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
16 GB T-MobileSGH-T999
| Global Score | |
| 70 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Smoke black |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 200 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Power has a global score of 76.1, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S III's global score of 70. Moto G Power is a newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy S III, but it is somewhat thicker and notably heavier. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G Power has newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S III has Android 4.3 version.
The Galaxy S III features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Power, although it has a way smaller display, a lot worse 1280 x 720 resolution and a bit lower pixels density. The Moto G Power features a bit better processing power than Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G Power counts with a better camera than Galaxy S III, because it has a lot bigger aperture to take better images and video in low light environments, a way better 3840x2160 video resolution, a larger camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality and a back facing camera with a much better resolution.
The Motorola Moto G Power features a much better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Moto G Power features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2100mAh.
Moto G Power not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.