Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-05-03 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 830 hours standby time 22.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is much better than the Galaxy S III's global score of 69.7. LG V35 ThinQ's design is newer and thinner than the Galaxy S III's, but it's also somewhat heavier. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster) and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels, a larger screen and a way higher pixels density. LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S III, because although it has a smaller camera sensor providing a worse image quality, it also counts with a way bigger camera aperture, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much higher 16 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a superior battery performance than Galaxy S III, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
LG V35 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheap compared to the Samsung Galaxy S III, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.