Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2012-05-03 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 830 hours standby time 22.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Power has an overall score of 76.1, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S III's general score of 69.7. Moto G Power's construction is extremely newer than the Samsung Galaxy S III's, but it's thicker and extremely heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G Power has newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S III has Android 4.3 version, so it offers a lot of extra features.
The Galaxy S III features a little sharper screen than Moto G Power, although it has a quite lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a way lower 1280 x 720px resolution and a lot smaller display. Motorola Moto G Power features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and more CPU cores.
Moto G Power has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S III, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G Power features a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a 138 percent more battery capacity.
Moto G Power captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a back facing camera with much more MP, a larger sensor taking better quality photographs and videos, a way higher video quality and a lot bigger aperture.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Motorola Moto G Power is also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.