Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
32 GBGT-I9300
| Global Score | |
| 71 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-05-03 | 2021-04-20 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.47 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 830 hours standby time 22.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has an overall score of 78.3, which is better than Galaxy S III's score of 71. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10's construction is notably newer and just a bit thinner than Galaxy S III's, but it's also much heavier. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has newer 11 version while Galaxy S III has Android 4.3 version, offering a lot of extra features.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a really brighter display, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a lot bigger display and more pixels per display inch. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and more cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a better camera than Galaxy S III, because it has a way bigger aperture, a way more MP back-facing camera and a way larger sensor capturing lot higher quality photos and videos. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a very superior battery life than Galaxy S III, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.