Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
32 GB T-MobileSGH-T999
| Global Score | |
| 71.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 200 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is way better than Galaxy S III, with an 87.1 score against 71.3. Even though the LG Velvet is much heavier than Galaxy S III, it's a bit thinner and incredibly newer. LG Velvet counts with a better CPU than Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S III has a little sharper display than LG Velvet, although it has a little bit worse pixels density, a really smaller screen and a lot worse 1280 x 720px resolution. LG Velvet has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet has a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a 105% bigger battery capacity. The LG Velvet features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a way higher resolution camera in the back, a lot bigger sensor, a way bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and video and a way higher (4K) video resolution.
The LG Velvet is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also the cheapest, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.